Learn about SOC 2 vs ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, HITRUST, FedRAMP, PCI DSS, SOC 2+, and much more through the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) below. Please schedule a consultation if you are looking for a SOC 2 Readiness Partner or would like to discuss a customized solution for your organization.
Table of Contents
How does SOC 2 compare to ISO 27001?
SOC 2 and ISO 27001 both address information security through independent third-party assessments and share approximately 70% control overlap, but they differ in market focus, structure, and output. SOC 2 was developed by the AICPA for the US market, produces an attestation report, not a certificate, and allows each organization to design its own controls to satisfy the Trust Services Criteria. ISO 27001 was developed by the International Organization for Standardization, carries global recognition, and produces a formal certification requiring a prescriptive Information Security Management System (ISMS). For US enterprise sales, SOC 2 is the expected standard; for international markets, ISO 27001 opens additional doors. Organizations that achieve SOC 2 compliance first find ISO 27001 certification significantly more efficient to pursue subsequently, given the shared control infrastructure.
What is the SOC 2 timeline for organizations that already hold ISO 27001?
Organizations with a current ISO 27001 certification have approximately 70% of SOC 2 controls already implemented, reducing the path to a SOC 2 Report primarily to documentation translation and SOC 2-specific additions. The remaining 30% typically covers SOC 2-specific requirements, system description preparation, Management Assertion drafting, Complementary User Entity Controls (CUEC) documentation, and Trust Services Criteria mapping that ISO 27001 does not require in the same format. A realistic timeline for an ISO 27001-certified organization is three to four months to a Type 1 Report, and six to nine months to a Type 2 Report with a three-month observation period. Cost savings compared to a greenfield SOC 2 program are material, primarily in reduced remediation work.
Does SOC 2 compliance help with HIPAA?
SOC 2 compliance helps substantially with HIPAA alignment, though it does not replace HIPAA compliance. SOC 2’s Security and Privacy criteria overlap significantly with HIPAA’s Security Rule requirements for technical safeguards, access controls, encryption, audit logging, and incident response. The critical distinction is that HIPAA does not require an audit by a licensed independent auditor, meaning there is no statutory mechanism producing external, independently verified proof of control effectiveness. A SOC 2 Report fills this gap, providing covered entities and business partners with independently tested assurance that HIPAA compliance status alone cannot deliver.
Does SOC 2 compliance help with GDPR?
SOC 2 compliance helps with GDPR through the Privacy criterion, which aligns substantially with GDPR’s core principles. SOC 2 Privacy controls address data collection with notice and consent, use limitation, data quality, retention and disposal, and data subject access rights, mapping to GDPR’s lawful processing principles, data minimization requirements, and individual rights provisions. The Security criterion aligns with GDPR Article 32’s requirement for appropriate technical and organizational security measures. Organizations that build SOC 2 Privacy and Security controls as a foundation find GDPR’s remaining specific requirements, documentation of processing activities, Data Protection Impact Assessments, and breach notification procedures, considerably more efficient to address.
Does SOC 2 compliance help with CCPA?
SOC 2 compliance helps with CCPA through the Privacy criterion, which addresses personal information lifecycle management at the core of CCPA obligations. SOC 2 Privacy controls cover how personal information is collected with appropriate notice, used only for disclosed purposes, retained only as long as necessary, and disposed of appropriately, aligning with CCPA’s transparency and data rights requirements. The Security criterion addresses CCPA’s requirement for reasonable security procedures. SOC 2 does not satisfy all CCPA requirements, consumer rights fulfillment processes, privacy policy disclosures, and opt-out mechanisms have CCPA-specific elements, but it establishes the security and data management foundation that CCPA compliance depends on.
What is SOC 2+?
SOC 2+ is an extended SOC 2 examination in which the standard Trust Services Criteria evaluation is supplemented with simultaneous testing against one or more additional compliance frameworks, producing combined assurance in a single audit engagement. Common extensions include HIPAA Security Rule, HITRUST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and NIST SP 800-53. Shared controls are tested once and credited to multiple frameworks simultaneously, reducing overall audit burden compared to running separate assessments. SOC 2+ is particularly relevant for healthcare technology vendors needing combined HIPAA and SOC 2 assurance, and for organizations selling into federal markets where NIST alignment is required.
How does SOC 2 compare to HITRUST in healthcare?
HITRUST CSF and SOC 2 both address data security in healthcare but serve different purposes, and the choice between them depends on the organization’s customer base and procurement requirements. HITRUST is a proprietary, certifiable framework developed specifically for healthcare with a prescriptive control set, producing a certification issued by the HITRUST Alliance and recognized as a comprehensive compliance credential in healthcare procurement. SOC 2 is more flexible, serves organizations across industries, and produces an attestation report. Some covered entities accept either; others require HITRUST specifically because its control set maps more directly to HIPAA requirements. Organizations can address both through SOC 2+ with HITRUST mapping, producing a single report covering both frameworks simultaneously. Healthcare vendors selling exclusively to large health systems should evaluate HITRUST seriously; those selling to mixed markets often start with SOC 2 and add HITRUST via SOC 2+ in a subsequent cycle.
How does SOC 2 compare to FedRAMP?
SOC 2 is a voluntary commercial standard demonstrating security assurance to private-sector customers. FedRAMP, the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, is a mandatory US government authorization program for cloud service providers selling to federal agencies, based on NIST SP 800-53 controls that are significantly more prescriptive and extensive than SOC 2’s Trust Services Criteria. A SOC 2 Report does not satisfy FedRAMP requirements. However, achieving SOC 2 compliance, particularly with a NIST SP 800-53 SOC 2+ extension, provides meaningful groundwork for organizations beginning a FedRAMP authorization journey. The two frameworks are complementary rather than interchangeable: SOC 2 serves the commercial market; FedRAMP is required for federal market access.
How does SOC 2 compare to PCI DSS?
SOC 2 and PCI DSS both address data security but apply to different data types and carry different compliance obligations. PCI DSS, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, is a mandatory requirement for any organization that stores, processes, or transmits payment card data, enforced through card network agreements rather than government regulation. SOC 2 is a voluntary framework covering the broader data environment relevant to any service organization managing customer data, not limited to payment data. The two frameworks overlap in areas including access controls, encryption, logging, and incident response, and a well-implemented SOC 2 program provides a meaningful foundation for PCI DSS compliance. E-commerce, fintech, and payment processing organizations frequently hold both: PCI DSS to satisfy card network mandates, SOC 2 to satisfy enterprise buyer procurement requirements.
What is SOC 2 for non-US organizations?
SOC 2 was developed by the AICPA primarily for the US market but is increasingly pursued by organizations headquartered outside the United States that sell to US-based enterprise customers. A non-US organization can undergo a SOC 2 examination conducted by a US-licensed CPA firm or, in some jurisdictions, by locally licensed auditors operating under an AICPA-recognized reciprocal arrangement. Non-US organizations frequently pursue SOC 2 alongside ISO 27001, SOC 2 to satisfy US customer requirements, ISO 27001 to satisfy international and European requirements, leveraging the 70% control overlap. Local data residency laws, cross-border data transfer restrictions, and jurisdiction-specific privacy regulations, including GDPR, PIPEDA, and PDPA, may affect the Privacy criterion scope and how the system description documents data flows.
Explore Blogs, Webinars and other Resources
Trusted by Reputed Companies
Accreditations and Associations
* Disclaimer: This list of accreditations is held by our team of employees and consultants.
What Our Clients Say
We used databrackets (formerly EHR 2.0) in our small medical practice for our risk analysis assessment to be in compliance with meaningful use. Their response was fast, the final report is detailed but simple and easy to follow. They were always available to answer our questions.
E. Compres
Pulmonary and Sleep Center of the Valley
I never miss the opportunity to learn something new …that’s why I am always registering to all free seminars offered on the web. databrackets (formerly EHR 2.0) happened to be the friendliest, comprehensive and up-to- date source of HIPAA Privacy and Security updates.
Alexandra V.
Community Healthcare Network
Today’s presentation was great! Thank you for sending the slides. My only feedback is that it would be fabulous to have the slides ahead of time so I could print them and take notes on the slides.Thanks for your time and knowledge today!
T.B., PM
Community Health Network
Particularly interesting was the flow chart on Administrative Simplification. I utilize all of the Security subcategories you list under the Security tile and appreciate knowing that I am hitting all of the relevant topics during my employee training.
Jessica B.
JD, CHC
I have re-worked our original risk assessment….We are using databrackets' (formerly EHR 2.0) Meaningful Use Security Risk Analysis Toolkit and it meets our needs. It was easy to use and I believe that it very beneficial to our meeting meaningful use.
Bill Curtis
Neurosurgical Associates Of Texarkana, TX
Information (webinars) presented by databrackets (formerly EHR 2.0) highlights some of today’s most demanding healthcare topics. The webinars help to direct those operating in today’s rapidly changing environment in the right direction.
Candace M.
Privacy and Security Officer, Springhill Medical Center
Our Growing List of Credentials
0
+
Assessments
0
+
Clients
0
+
Assessment Libraries
0
+
Years of Experience
0
+
No. of Staff Trained
0
+
HIPAA
0
+
SOC 2 Readiness
0
+
Pen Testing
0
+
ISO 27001 Certifications
0
+
Dollars Saved in Compliance Penalties