Learn about verifying the affiliation of your SOC 2 Auditor, cost and timeline differences, changing your Auditor mid-engagement, and more through the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) below. Please schedule a consultation if you are looking for a SOC 2 Readiness Partner or would like to discuss a customized solution for your organization.
Table of Contents
Who can perform a SOC 2 examination?
Only a licensed Certified Public Accountant (CPA) or CPA firm affiliated with the AICPA is authorized to conduct a SOC 2 examination. The AICPA sets the framework and standards but does not perform examinations itself. This requirement is what gives the resulting report its credibility, customers receive the opinion of a licensed professional with independent obligations, not an internal self-assessment or a compliance checklist completed by an unaccountable party.
What are the cost and timeline differences between types of SOC 2 auditors?
SOC 2 auditor fees and timelines vary significantly by firm type, specialist boutique firms offer the fastest timelines and lowest fees, while Big Four firms carry the highest fees and longest engagements.
Big Four firms (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG) charge $60,000–$150,000+ for Type 2 examinations and typically take twelve to twenty months. Mid-size national and regional CPA firms charge $20,000–$50,000 for Type 2 and complete examinations in eight to twelve months. Boutique SOC 2 specialist firms charge $10,000–$35,000 for Type 2 and complete examinations in six to ten months. Specialist firms with fifty or more completed SOC 2 examinations often deliver deeper technical expertise and faster turnaround than large generalist firms. Hybrid auditors, US-licensed but with global operations, can price 40–60% lower than fully US-based teams for functionally equivalent work.
What questions should organizations ask a prospective SOC 2 auditor before hiring?
Seven questions identify capable, well-matched SOC 2 auditors, and an auditor who cannot answer them clearly before the contract is signed will not manage the engagement efficiently after it begins.
The first question is how many SOC 2 examinations the firm has completed for organizations in the specific industry, with a request for sample reports from that sector. The second is the firm’s typical response time for evidence requests during fieldwork. The third is how the firm receives evidence, a structured platform or email spreadsheets. The fourth is whether the engagement contract includes multi-year continuity requirements and whether those terms are negotiable before signing. The fifth is the fee structure if scope changes arise during the examination. The sixth is the expected total duration from engagement signing to report issuance. The seventh is who specifically, by name and credentials, will sign the opinion letter.
How can an organization verify that a SOC 2 auditor is genuinely AICPA-affiliated?
There is no public AICPA registry of firms approved to perform SOC 2 examinations, so verification requires direct confirmation through state licensing records and AICPA program enrollment. The process involves identifying the named CPA or engagement partner on the auditor’s team, verifying their active CPA license through the relevant state board of accountancy’s public license lookup, and confirming the firm is enrolled in the AICPA’s peer review program, which requires firms performing attestation services to undergo regular quality assessments. Warning signs of unqualified parties marketing SOC 2 services include inability to provide a named licensed CPA who will sign the opinion letter, fees significantly below market rate for the scope described, reports lacking the standard four-section structure, and use of the phrase “SOC 2 certification” in the auditor’s own marketing, which signals unfamiliarity with the attestation framework they are purporting to provide.
What happens if an organization needs to change SOC 2 auditors mid-engagement?
Changing SOC 2 auditors after an engagement has begun is possible but adds cost and time, and the extent depends entirely on how far into the examination the transition occurs.
If the examination has not yet entered formal fieldwork, the transition is relatively straightforward, the new auditor reviews scope documentation, gap assessment, and evidence organized to date, then begins fieldwork from that point. If fieldwork has already begun, the new auditor must independently assess the evidence and cannot simply accept prior conclusions, this typically requires restarting portions of fieldwork, adding both cost and time to the overall engagement. The AICPA does not require organizations to continue with the same auditor across annual cycles, multi-year continuity requirements in some CPA firm contracts are commercial terms, not regulatory obligations, and are negotiable before signing. Before changing auditors mid-engagement, the prospective new auditor should confirm what they will and will not accept from the prior engagement to understand the full implications.
Should organizations use a readiness partner and a separate CPA for the SOC 2 examination?
Using a separate readiness partner and CPA for the SOC 2 examination is the correct approach. This separation is required to maintain auditor independence. A readiness partner is a security expert or compliance firm that prepares the organization and the auditor is an independent CPA conducting the formal examination. If the same firm both prepares the organization and audits it, the auditor’s independence is structurally compromised, and the resulting report loses credibility with the enterprise buyers it is intended to assure. The readiness partner organizes controls, structures evidence, prepares the Management Assertion, and readies the team for fieldwork. The auditor then independently examines what was prepared. Some readiness partners like databrackets have established working relationships with CPA firms they collaborate with regularly, which can streamline the documentation handoff. However, all organizations retain the option to engage their own CPA firm of choice.
Explore Blogs, Webinars and other Resources
Trusted by Reputed Companies
Accreditations and Associations
* Disclaimer: This list of accreditations is held by our team of employees and consultants.
What Our Clients Say
We used databrackets (formerly EHR 2.0) in our small medical practice for our risk analysis assessment to be in compliance with meaningful use. Their response was fast, the final report is detailed but simple and easy to follow. They were always available to answer our questions.
E. Compres
Pulmonary and Sleep Center of the Valley
I never miss the opportunity to learn something new …that’s why I am always registering to all free seminars offered on the web. databrackets (formerly EHR 2.0) happened to be the friendliest, comprehensive and up-to- date source of HIPAA Privacy and Security updates.
Alexandra V.
Community Healthcare Network
Today’s presentation was great! Thank you for sending the slides. My only feedback is that it would be fabulous to have the slides ahead of time so I could print them and take notes on the slides.Thanks for your time and knowledge today!
T.B., PM
Community Health Network
Particularly interesting was the flow chart on Administrative Simplification. I utilize all of the Security subcategories you list under the Security tile and appreciate knowing that I am hitting all of the relevant topics during my employee training.
Jessica B.
JD, CHC
I have re-worked our original risk assessment….We are using databrackets' (formerly EHR 2.0) Meaningful Use Security Risk Analysis Toolkit and it meets our needs. It was easy to use and I believe that it very beneficial to our meeting meaningful use.
Bill Curtis
Neurosurgical Associates Of Texarkana, TX
Information (webinars) presented by databrackets (formerly EHR 2.0) highlights some of today’s most demanding healthcare topics. The webinars help to direct those operating in today’s rapidly changing environment in the right direction.
Candace M.
Privacy and Security Officer, Springhill Medical Center
Our Growing List of Credentials
0
+
Assessments
0
+
Clients
0
+
Assessment Libraries
0
+
Years of Experience
0
+
No. of Staff Trained
0
+
HIPAA
0
+
SOC 2 Readiness
0
+
Pen Testing
0
+
ISO 27001 Certifications
0
+
Dollars Saved in Compliance Penalties